(Motorsport-Total.com) – Adrian Newey has lost none of the qualities that made him one of the most successful engineers in Formula 1 since his time at McLaren. This is the conclusion reached by Pedro de la Rosa, who has worked with the Briton both during his time as a test driver at McLaren and today at Aston Martin.
Read more Lando Norris warns: Ferrari could soon «dominate» Formula 1
During a media discussion, de la Rosa was asked if he noticed any differences between working with Newey some 20 years ago and today. The Spaniard clearly denied this and recounted an anecdote from earlier years.
“The only difference is actually that I unfortunately no longer drive his cars,” explains de la Rosa. “I see no difference in Adrian at all. He works with full commitment. His work ethic is outstanding.”
Newey listens to drivers instead of just data
De la Rosa particularly emphasized how attentively Newey still responds to his drivers’ feedback. In an era where data analysis plays an increasingly important role in motorsport, this is by no means a given.
“He is one of those engineers who listens to the driver more than anyone else I have ever worked with,” says de la Rosa. “Nowadays, you sometimes talk to an engineer and he looks at the screen. Then you don’t know if the data is right or you are. Adrian, on the other hand, writes your comments in his notebook.”
When six degrees made the difference
As an example, de la Rosa recounts an anecdote from Friday practice at the 2005 Australian Grand Prix. At that time, a third car was still used in free practice, which the Spaniard drove. After a few laps, Newey had only asked him one question: “Why can’t you go faster in Turn 1?”
De la Rosa then explained that the car understeered heavily when turning in and therefore he could not carry more speed. Newey then asked about the approximate steering angle at the apex of the corner. The Spaniard indicated this with his hands.
Read more Lando Norris warns: Ferrari could soon «dominate» Formula 1
“He immediately said: ‘Okay, that’s six degrees,’” de la Rosa still reports today. “Then he explained to me that you couldn’t go beyond six degrees in the wind tunnel because the car would then no longer rotate sufficiently and generate the necessary yaw angle.”
The background from today’s perspective
Such a driving situation could hardly be replicated in the 2005 wind tunnel. For this, the model vehicle would have had to be subjected to an airflow with a yaw angle, while at the same time the wheels would have been turned and rolling on the moving steel belt.
However, at angles greater than six degrees, the systems of the time reached their limits. The tires began to rub sideways on the belt, leading to significant heating and high wear. This is precisely why the aerodynamicists in this area relied on the feedback from their drivers.
Small change with big impact
Newey had noted down the comments at the time and announced that he already had some ideas for solving the problem. These changes to the front wing were implemented as early as the following race. The vehicle subsequently reacted significantly less sensitively to steering inputs.
For de la Rosa, this episode illustrates why Newey enjoys such an exceptional reputation in the paddock. The Briton not only listens attentively but is also able to translate driver feedback into concrete technical improvements.
In the Spaniard’s view, it is precisely this combination that makes Newey an inspiring personality for the entire Aston Martin team and especially for the young engineers of the racing stable.
Read more Lando Norris warns: Ferrari could soon «dominate» Formula 1